Quote:
Originally Posted by imprezap2
Hi Stock78,
Bottom end of the S3's is not weak or less focussed, as they are closed design it might seem that way, but they go deeper and have more precision than the E1.
Don't get me wrong, I also like the E1's (for sure in looks department), but overall I think the S3's have more body, are more coherent and slightly more musical.
It's a bit apples and pears, the S3 being a floorstander and the E1 being a standmount.
IMO the E1 should be compared to the Q1.
Anyway, as you say, we all have our own preferences.
|
imprezap2,
Confusion here occurs. I made it clear in the second post it was the TAD Evolution One (E1) which was compared to the Magico S3. This E1 is also a floorstander.
I think you compared S3 with the Compact Evolution One (CE1), which is indeed a standmount.
And I said that the S3 was weak and less focussed, IN COMPARISON! (to TAD E1); I did not say that S3 is W & LF.
However, I liked even the CE1 better
overall, as each his own.
Thanks for your insights.