I look at this from an economics perspective. Tidal and Qobuz are not yet profitable.
Even Spotify with 100 milllion customers is losing money. This from Spotify's Q2 earnings report:
"Operating Losses totaled €3 million yielding an Operating Margin of (0.2%)"
BTW that's better than they have ever done, and most of their revenue comes from the paid premium service.
Tidal and Qobuz are privately held, so finaniclas are opaque. But in my view they are financial time bombs.
Amazon has a massive global web hosting capability - arguably the largest. AWS also accounts for most of their profits. Their infrastructure costs for storage and egress (streaming) are going to be lower than Tidal and Qobuz by a wide margin.
Amazon has the infrastructure and financial power to prevail. That's if the content owners will play ball with them, which I suspect they will.
Having worked with Amazon Alexa - they will publish all the API's needed for Roon to access thier service, and they will help them get going, but it will be up to Roon to do all the work required to integrate Amazon Music HD into their platform.
Like a character in Game of Thrones, I wouldn't get too attached to your favorite streaming service just yet. 
Tom
__________________
Main System:
Amati Futura Mains
Amati Homage VOX Center,
Proac Response 1sc Rears,
Three MC2301's for L,C,R
MC 602 for the rears
C 1100, MX 151, MCD 1100, MR 80
Nottingham Dais with Wave Mechanic
Sumiko Palo Santos Presentation
SurfacePro 3, RPi 4, ROON, WW Starlight Platinum USB, Schiit Yggdrasil, Benchmark DAC3 HGC
MX 151, OppO BDP-95, JVC RS-500 DILA projector, 106" diagonal Stewart Luxus Screenwall Deluxe with Studiotek 130 G3 material.
Lake House:
Ohm F, MC 275V, C2300, MR 77, Rega P3
OnDeck:
McIntosh MAC 4300v
Last edited by W9TR; 09-19-2019 at 08:04 AM.
|