View Single Post
  #21  
Old 08-31-2012, 05:23 PM
hce1 hce1 is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 21
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by VT Skier View Post
I'm not surprised you found the Q3s to be better than the S5, although I hope my ears can't tell. May I ask what electronics were used in your comparison? And have you decided on what you'll use for your Q3s?
Hi VT Skier,

The S5 versus Q3 comparison was made on VAC Statement 450S amp and VAC Statement with a top of the line Metronome CD player, top of the line MIT cables. Same room, same electronics. The S5 is voiced differently than the Q series. Bass is more emphasized and Magico is going for an impactful sound. The Q series has higher resolution and refinement. The tweeter was seemingly better intergrated and lower in distortion in the Q3 compared to the S5. The Q series sounds a bit more coherent, made from the same "fabric" type of sound. I've also heard the S5 on Constellation Audio (but this was at a Show), and they sounded great!

I bought my Q3s before the S series came out, but I'm happy with my decision. I've got VAC Phi 200 monoblocks powering my Q3s and a VAC Renaissance preamp. I also have a Pass X350.5 and the extra power is appreciated on the Q3s, but I lose some detail, resolution and holographic imaging with the Pass amp. I might try Spectral since Magico recommends them so highly, or perhaps even upgrade to bigger VAC amps...

The S5 is a great speaker no doubt.

Hope this helps.
Reply With Quote