Quote:
Originally Posted by Kal Rubinson
Undoubtedly.
As a scientist, my objection to the HFN point system is the implied granularity/resolution of the scale. What is the interpretation of a 5 point or less difference when based on a subjective assessment? Stereophile's handful (or less) of categories should imply clear distinctions except when one of us shades it with a "near" or "almost."
Perhaps. I do not know what their criteria are but Stereophile's do not include price considerations.
|
Wait, you’re saying there’s more ambiguity with HFN rating because they use numbers rather than vague classes on stereophile?