AudioQuest Niagara 7000 vs. 5000
Has anyone done a direct comparison of the AudioQuest Niagara 7000 vs. 5000? If so, can you articulate the difference in sound quality?
Thanks, Ken |
I have not heard either unit. I知 sure you know this ...... from what I have been told, the high current amplifier specific outlets are identical between the 5000 and 7000; only the source, constant current outlets are different with the 7000 having better filtration/noise dissipation. The 7000 has isolation transformers whereas the 5000 does not. Now, how that all translates into how they sound is a mystery to me but I have heard people say the 7000 is sonically superior, not hard to hear differences.
|
FWIW, Garth Powell, the Niagra designer, has said that the 5000 provides 90% of the benefits of the 7000.
|
I’m also looking into the differences between the 5000 and 7000. They both make reference to this spec but I’ve seen both 80 and 90 amp references. Thoughts?
Transient Power Correction: Provides over 90 amps peak instantaneous current reservoir with reduced line impedance for current-starved power amplifiers, whether they incorporate linear or switching power supplies. |
As I understand it the only difference between the AQ Niagara 5000 and 7000 models is that the 7000 includes an isolation transformer for its lower current outlets. Such a xfmr provides additional noise reduction and isolation for gear connected to those outlets. I've also read that with some gear (mostly tube) there can be some hum issues with the 7000, so in those cases the 5000 is recommended.
|
Pure speculation but I wonder how far off version 2 of the Niagara is. I’m sure they have learned a lot with version 1.
|
Quote:
I asked my regional rep that very question last month .... of course his answer was there are no plans for a revision. I tend to agree with you, the 7000 was designed a handful of years ago, in audio years one would expect a v2 on the horizon. |
I can speak a little bit about the Niagara power conditioners. The 7000 is much heavier. I have all my sources plugged in to the low current outlets. The unit has worked flawlessly. For my amps I use 1 5000 per channel. No sources are plugged in. I run them in standby mode. Although I run the 7000 in the engaged mode I have not noticed any increase in my electric bill in so doing. As far as sound improvement as you might imagine I experienced a significant improvement over my 20 year old MIT gear. My installation was difficult and time consuming. I did not have the luxury of comparing the 5000 to the 7000. If you can afford it the 7000 is definitely the one for sources. The 5000 is similar to a 1000 regarding sources. Again the 7000 is twice the weight of a 5000 but there is no difference in the high current section. I like these units and plan on keeping them for a long time as I did for my MIT gear.
|
Quote:
I still have the rental unit there with the old components. My own 5000 is still in the customs and is already the improved revision. But the dealer couldn't tell me to what extent all this is really reflected in the sound. |
I have sort of a power hungry preamp that lost dynamics when plugged into a Denali. Thoughts on which set of plugs I should use in the Niagara?
|
When you stand behind the Niagara -> on the far right side. Upper or lower plug doesn't matter.
AND! Get a Thunder as a minimum-level Power Cord. You won't regret that. (Till yesterday i had a WireWorld Silver Elektra 7 for my Pre and changed it with a AQ Tornado. The change was really dramatic.) |
I recently bought 2 5000's and 1 7000, probably 3 months ago. There is no mention of the website of an improved 5000. If you are going to use the AQ system for an amp only as I do, the 5000 provides the same level of quality as the 7000. It provides 90 amps peak current. However, there is very little difference than the 1000 for sources. With 7000 you get high current 90 amp transformer and 8 isolation transformers for sources. The 5000 does not provide this. I seriously doubt that AQ is going to fundamentally redesign their power conditioners anytime soon but maybe I'm incorrect. The use of these transformers (5000 or 7000 in engaged mode) can increase your electric bill because they can create the appearance of a constant 9-10 amp draw per unit. However, this did not happen with me. It depends on the sophistication of your electric service. With the 1000 since it has no transformers this potentially fictitious current draw is not a problem. Before buying a 5000 or 7000 I recommend reading the OM carefully. It's on the website.
|
Quote:
|
Found a review of the 5000 AND 7000:
http://www.theaudiobeat.com/equipmen..._5000_7000.htm Edit: There are lots of words written there, but... |
Quote:
|
Quote:
I have the 5000. I should switch 5000 to engaged mode and leave it there forever. If the Amp is off i don't have a higher bill. But... If i switch all on to have a nice 6-hour listening session my bill will increase more than normal. Is this right till here? (My plan is to switch the chain/5000 completely off when not used.) |
Quote:
|
I can tell you that the 5000 does have multiple transformers. Look at the website where it shows the inside of the unit. I also checked with AQ. I thought it necessary to have a transformer as part of the TPC. When I switch my amps on and off I hear a fairly loud click and I thought it was a transfer switch/transformer being engaged and disengaged inside the 5000. You appear to be running the standby mode correctly which allows the TPC to disengage when your amp is turned off. However, unless you have an amp plugged in to a 5000 or 7000 HC outlet the standby feature is not available. I use my 7000 only for sources, so it stays in the engaged position all the time. Turning sources on and off will not engage or disengage the TPC. You must turn an amp on also. For both units to work properly, when either amps or sources are turned on the TPC must be engaged. This can under some circumstances increase your electric bill, because if you have only sources plugged in and the unit in standby, turning on a source will not switch the unit to engaged and turning sources off will not disengage the TPC. Again for the units to work properly, they must be in the engaged mode when sources or amps are on. I have not found that my electric bill increased with the 7000 in the engaged mode all the time.
As I recall (I'm not going to re-plug to confirm it), for the standby mode to work properly, at least one of your amps must be plugged in to the upper HC outlet (Bank 1) on the 5000 or 7000. Otherwise you will not hear the click which means the TPC has engaged. If the standby mode is working properly when you turn the amp on/off you will hear a distinct click a second to a few seconds later. |
With all due respect I think you may be confusing the large inductors in the ground noise dissipation system with transformers. True isolation transformers are only in the 7000 and that is the primary difference between it and the 5000. If you look at the description of the 7000 it states:
Two Discrete Symmetrical AC Power Isolation Transformers (not shown) These massive transformers provide 100% isolation from the middle four AC source outlets, from the middle four source AC outlets and the high current AC outlets. Additionally, symmetrical induced noise (common-mode) is reduced to the lowest level possible, over the widest range of frequencies possible. Those transformers (which it notes are not shown in the pictures) are not in the 5000 and are what accounts for the 43 lbs. additional weight of the 7000. |
Quote:
|
Thanks for this discussion. The info is very helpful to me. As I have two 20 amp dedicated lines, I’m leaning towards two units. One Niagara 7000, which I’ll plug my MSB Select II DAC into the Low Current Outlets and my left amp and left speaker (subwoofer amp) into the High Current Outlets. One Niagara 5000, which I’ll plug my right amp and right speaker (subwoofer amp) into the High Current Outlets.
Ken |
Charles - Glad to help clear this up! Sounds like your setup is really optimized by using the 7000 for all of your sources, so they're all benefiting from the isolation transformers. :thumbsup:
Ken - Sounds like you've got a very solid plan as well! :thumbsup: |
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:02 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.10
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
ゥCopyright 2009-2023 AudioAficionado.org.Privately owned, All Rights Reserved.