MEN220 | MEN-220 Problems persist...
Just to further prove a point mentioned earlier about the global communication channel this forum provides, and so that our McFriends take a look:
Google #4 & #5, until the next cache cycle where the "MEN-220" problems will come to the forefront... Here Google #3 on "MEN220" - again, when this re-caches, the problem threads will come forward. HERE Oops... |
|
Quote:
|
This is a topic that could be discussed a little bit. As a public forum
there are certain responsibilities to what we want to say and how we say them. It is a great forum where we all learn a lot from other experiences/experiments/ideas, but one should not exploit it to the extend of causing potential damages. As a example, a professional reviewer has the obligation to be truthful and respectful enough to avoid incurring in damaging the image of the company responsible for that product, since the comments may have a very broad reach. Now, since the MEN220 is such a new product and with its acronym being so unique, there are not many hits coming up when someone does a search. If on top of that we add the search keyword "problem" or "issue", then of course, most of the results will point back to here. So I think we should, or at least, we could be more sensible while describing what we see. I agree that most of the MEN220 owners are in the desperate side to get a resolution, but this is just one extra factor to take into consideration. The car analogy was a good one. Many cars have certain recalls, they get fixed and people move on. When the car is definately not right as in a lemon car, then the possibility to get an exchange is always there. I think this belongs to a recall situation and maybe the procedures within dealers and the company are not just there and the wait and delay in the response is more the issue now rather than the fault. Sal |
Hi Sal... I don't see MEN220 in your signature line, do you have one?
|
|
Quote:
of ironic) but I think my comment is valid regarless having it or not. No offense to Vesuvius, just pointing out that we all have to be a little bit sensible, that's all. |
Sorry, piolaxo - but I do not believe in protecting corporations in the same way you do. If they screw up, they deserve to get vetted, just like any actual human.
The purpose of the post was to let the McSpys know that their new piece of gear has the wrong type of attention for those looking to search for more info on it. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:13 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.10
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©Copyright 2009-2023 AudioAficionado.org.Privately owned, All Rights Reserved.