AudioAficionado.org

AudioAficionado.org (https://www.audioaficionado.org/index.php)
-   McIntosh Audio (https://www.audioaficionado.org/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   MEN220 | MEN-220 Problems persist... (https://www.audioaficionado.org/showthread.php?t=5861)

-E- 10-14-2010 01:52 PM

MEN220 | MEN-220 Problems persist...
 
Just to further prove a point mentioned earlier about the global communication channel this forum provides, and so that our McFriends take a look:

Google #4 & #5, until the next cache cycle where the "MEN-220" problems will come to the forefront...
Here

Google #3 on "MEN220" - again, when this re-caches, the problem threads will come forward. HERE

Oops...

-E- 10-14-2010 01:55 PM

Would also add if you type in "men220 problem" you get THIS

#1-3 is AA - and a lot of unhappiness.

Jerome W 10-14-2010 02:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vesuvius (Post 112782)
Would also add if you type in "men220 problem" you get THIS

#1-3 is AA - and a lot of unhappiness.

Glad to see that my thread about the RP1 wired as the MEN220 comes in second position ! this could be interesting for Lyngdorf.

piolaxo 10-14-2010 02:51 PM

This is a topic that could be discussed a little bit. As a public forum
there are certain responsibilities to what we want to say and how
we say them. It is a great forum where we all learn a lot from
other experiences/experiments/ideas, but one should not exploit
it to the extend of causing potential damages. As a example, a
professional reviewer has the obligation to be truthful and
respectful enough to avoid incurring in damaging the image of
the company responsible for that product, since the comments
may have a very broad reach.

Now, since the MEN220 is such a new product and with its
acronym being so unique, there are not many hits coming up
when someone does a search. If on top of that we add the
search keyword "problem" or "issue", then of course, most
of the results will point back to here. So I think we should,
or at least, we could be more sensible while describing what
we see.

I agree that most of the MEN220 owners are in the desperate
side to get a resolution, but this is just one extra factor to take
into consideration. The car analogy was a good one. Many cars
have certain recalls, they get fixed and people move on. When
the car is definately not right as in a lemon car, then the
possibility to get an exchange is always there. I think this belongs
to a recall situation and maybe the procedures within dealers and
the company are not just there and the wait and delay in the
response is more the issue now rather than the fault.

Sal

bradleyc 10-14-2010 04:59 PM

Hi Sal... I don't see MEN220 in your signature line, do you have one?

Masterlu 10-14-2010 05:07 PM

http://i614.photobucket.com/albums/t...g?t=1287089689

piolaxo 10-14-2010 06:07 PM

Quote:

Hi Sal... I don't see MEN220 in your signature line, do you have one?
Hi, no I don't have one (I wished I had one even if it sounds kind
of ironic) but I think my comment is valid regarless having it or
not. No offense to Vesuvius, just pointing out that we all have to
be a little bit sensible, that's all.

-E- 10-14-2010 10:57 PM

Sorry, piolaxo - but I do not believe in protecting corporations in the same way you do. If they screw up, they deserve to get vetted, just like any actual human.

The purpose of the post was to let the McSpys know that their new piece of gear has the wrong type of attention for those looking to search for more info on it.

j3brow 10-14-2010 11:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by masterlu (Post 112815)

lol!

Masterlu 10-14-2010 11:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by j3brow (Post 112901)
lol!

Am I supposed to remember what that was? :D


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:13 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.10
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©Copyright 2009-2023 AudioAficionado.org.Privately owned, All Rights Reserved.