AudioAficionado.org - bLINK....why better? Please explain

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wyred4Sound (Post 766344)

Hello AJ,

The short answer is, the Femto in the Remedy is the same as in the bLINK. So what can be deduced from the Remedy can also cross over to the bLINK. The benefit of reclocking the signal before it gets to the DAC is that the DAC has a cleaner signal to work with from the beginning. The resulting sound benefits from that. In this way, having the two in the chain together is not redundant.

Hope this helps.

Respectfully and unfortunately, it does not help much... Except to add to the confusion of multitude unproven statements we hear on everyday bases in many parts of the Audio world.

I'm not doubting W4S products work independently but would like to "see" the improvement chaining bLink or Remedy to DSDse.

It would be nice if you could show this signal improvement on a graph or with same software screen shot you used and posted on your website for the Remedy.

Original signal with Screen shot showing jitter -> bLINK output signal with screenshot corrected jitter -> DAC-2 DSDse output signal with screen shot with final jitter...

Don't think it would take more than 20 minutes to do and it would finally put an end to sceptical like me who want to believe and purchase more W4S product to improve sound. It would also be great for W4S to prove the above theory.

Not going to dwell on this much longer, it seems we are going in circles.
Hope this helps as well.

Best, AJ