Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Gee guys
I almost wish I did not sell my prem350 a few years back. that said, my prem 8a's are the better sounding amplifiers, especially with 3d floating image, tone and upper frequency extension and "air" still, would have been nice to use during summer :-) |
Quote:
|
Quote:
First... as you doubt already know, that thing is a heavy 85 lb. and is not a well balanced lift. The left side is so much heavier than the right. It's a hoss to move around... and please be careful. The cooling fins on the left side all have sharp edges and will show no mercy to your forearms. Secondly... although this may be a good thing as you already like the sound...this was one of the first units in which C-J used proprietary teflon caps. I don't remember a break-in issue but the sound should only get better for you with time. I've never found the sound at all fatiguing and none of the reviewers that I've read did either. Is it as holographic as my LP140 tubes, probably not but it sure is faster with tighter lows. Back to the Ravens. Enjoy the champaign beast! :yes: Bob |
Quote:
Where does it say it has teflon caps? certainly not in the spec's Quote:
|
Quote:
I can remember discussing the caps with Tor Sivertsen (then sales manager for C-J) when I bought the 350 some years ago. Bob |
Here is the link to the Roy Gregory HiFi+ review of the Pr350:
http://www.conradjohnson.com/It_just...HiFi+PR350.pdf It does mention the use of Teflon caps.... |
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:50 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.10
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©Copyright 2009-2023 AudioAficionado.org.Privately owned, All Rights Reserved.