Which sampling rate for purchasing tracks?
 

I've got my music streaming set up finalized and begun upgrading my music library from 16 bit 44.1 hz files to higher def files - The options I am considering are 24 bit in either 96 hz or 192 hz (DSD is not in the equation)

I have a few of both the 96 hz and 192 hz files and they leave the 16 bit files in the dust - The difference in quality between 96 hz or 192 hz in some cases is small but in some cases the 192 hz files have more sound stage - Of course the file size of the 192 Hz is almost 2 1/2 times the size of the 96 hz so they chew up hard drive space - I'm guessing there is no general rule and that the source is more important than the sampling rate but I'm curious what other folks are using regarding these two sampling rates

Thoughts ?

PS --- Also wondering if Ivan has started a music downloading service yet :icon_jump::icon_jump:

You have it nailed. In my experience, the source is more important than 96hz vs 192hz.

Which sampling rate for purchasing tracks?
 

+1

My experience matches yours. The 96/24 gets you a practically inaudible difference to the 192/24. Either improves upon the 44/16 of rebook. I have read that getting the word length above 20 is more important than 96 or 192kHz. I suppose that’s what I’m hearing as the improvement.

As others have said, though, some of my best sounding digital is red book. Increased sampling can’t match a beautifully engineered and mastered recording. However, I have tested higher res downloads to the original redbook, using level matching, and the hires sounded better.

:tresbon:

Pity that you have decided against DSD my friend. For me, all I purchase these days is DSD and to the maximum that's on offering. Say, for instance with NativeDSD if you buy DSD128, DSD256 or whatever you can also download all of the lower rate versions. I find that handy for my PS Audio's Bridge II as it outputs DSD64. But also I can convert to PCM at any time using f.i. the Tascam Hi Res Editor.

Having said that, I can totally live with 44.1/24 and up.

I tend to acquire downloads either in the original resolution recorded or in a higher resolution if, and only if, it has been remastered from a RedBook original.

So, if NativeDSD indicates it was recorded at, say, DSD64, that's what I buy. Mere upsampling I can do myself (but do not).

In fact, I tend to prefer to convert all DSD/DXD to 24/192PCM in order to apply DiracLive EQ because its effect on the audible results is greater than any format differences. There are few exceptions.

Hmmmm .... maybe I am not understanding DSD correctly - I was told my equipment wouldn't support playback of that format - My signal chain is all hard wired:

Synology 216 NAS > Auralic Aries Bridge > Gold WireWorld Coaxil > McIntosh 100 DAC > Gold WireWorld Eclipse Stereo Connects > McIntosh MX 150

Am I missing something ?

Which sampling rate for purchasing tracks?
 

Yes, Your D100 will NOT decode DSD files.

Does your Auralic have the capability to downsample? If so, the next question is can it read DSD files and then downsample?

That is how the former post would work.

Dunno. I am unfamiliar with your specific equipment but their individual specs should tell you what you need to know. In addition, it is the narrowest portal which will define what you can do. (Forget Dirac.)