T-1200
 

Some very meager info on the new T-1200:
https://translate.google.co.uk/trans...7/&prev=search
Quite similar to the T-1100, but not enough detail to know.

Come to Daddy! :)

http://www.audiounion.jp/product_images/31989.jpg

Ivan.......The Accuphase T-1200 is going to look so good in that new mahogany HRS rack. . :yahoo:

Thanks Dan... I should have the very first one that comes to the USA. :banana:

They moved the buttons around, but it will be interesting to compare the technical features (once released) between the T-1200 & T-1100. Hopefully, we will get a comparison similar to this one that compares the T-1100 & T-1000.
http://www.accuphase.com/technical_i...nformation.pdf

Dibs on Ivan's old junker T-1100 :)

:roflmao:

I don't have any info on the T-1200 but the McIntosh MR80 is significantly more sensitive than the T-1100 which requires 37.5 dBf input for 50 dB quieting in stereo.

MR80 needs only 14.7 dBf for the same level of quieting in stereo (50 dB). Of course, this is only as critical as the desired signal is weak.

http://www.accuphase.com/cat/t-1100_e.pdf

Per the link you posted it is 17dBf with the T-1100. Think you must have misread.

However, I found no 'real world' difference in sensitivity between my Terry DeWick'd MR80 and my T-106, which is also rated at 17dBf. To my ears, the T-106 is the better sounding of the two. YMMV.

Darn. You bet me to it.

Glenn...that was for monophonic. ;)