Soffit Bass Trap in my Shopping Cart
Hey Glenn!
I'm generally quite happy with the acoustical work done for me by a local firm here in Dallas. About 25% room coverage really tamed the slap-echo in my living room. Having said that, I have one area where I have a room mode that needs to be absorbed. Because I'm looking primarily to absorb the deepest bass vs much more mid or high frequencies, am I correct in selecting the Soffit versus the tri-trap? I'd like to start with one and see where that gets me, and if necessary I can order a second and stack them. I also know that you sell the Monster Bass Trap that includes the optional range-limiter technology. Would that be another/better option for me and if so could I just stand that horizontally on the floor or would it need to be wall-mounted. I'm excited about getting this last touch done, and look forward to any advice/suggestions. Cheers, Steve |
If you are looking for a trap that reaches the lowest frequency then the Soffit Trap is the way to go. Keep in mind that generally we recommend 4 of them. 2 will help but you may want to add more over time. Low end absorption is truly about coverage of as many corners as possible.
|
Quote:
|
You can always lay them on the floor, in the corner, if there is space.
|
If it's super low, what about tuned traps? GIK has options for that as well if they'll fit for you.
|
Quote:
Thanks! |
The Monster is still considered broadband. With the limiter is does cut off around 300hz though. It is the Scopus that is tuned.
I think for most rooms something like the Soffit is a great way to go. You can always follow up with tuned if needed. |
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:38 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.10
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©Copyright 2009-2023 AudioAficionado.org.Privately owned, All Rights Reserved.