AudioAficionado.org

AudioAficionado.org (https://www.audioaficionado.org/index.php)
-   Bryston Audio (https://www.audioaficionado.org/forumdisplay.php?f=82)
-   -   Bryston cubed amplifier philosophy (https://www.audioaficionado.org/showthread.php?t=46697)

James Tanner - Bryston 09-19-2019 11:47 AM

Bryston cubed amplifier philosophy
 
Hi Folks,

A reviewer asked me recently what differences the Bryston Cubed Amplifiers incorporated (because he was smitten) over previous versions of our amplifiers. So I thought our customers might find the following interesting.

BRYSTON Cubed Amplifier Philosophy

FIRST TO LAST WATT PHILOSOPHY:

A significant part of the design criteria for the new Cubed amplifiers was to develop amplifiers that would maintain an ideal power curve through the 'first and last watt'. Most amplifiers exhibit a power curve whereby the best noise floor, drive capability and distortion are maintained from about 1/3 power and up. The new Bryston Cubed series maintain their ideal power curve right from the first watt to the last watt. Think of it like a torque curve in a car. The sweet spot or the torque curve has been expanded.

Achieving this 'First-to-last-Watt' fidelity and clarity has to do with a number of design approaches:

• First is complete freedom from low-level crossover, or zero-crossing, artifacts. This is not as easy as it sounds. Most class-AB amplifiers have sufficient bias to prevent primary crossover distortion, but there is another type of crossover artifact called 'secondary crossover distortion', caused by insufficient speed in the driver transistors. We use very fast drivers to prevent this, but more important is Bryston's proprietary Quad Complementary Output design vastly reduces the capacitance 'seen' by the driver transistors, virtually eliminating storage delay in the output stage that could contribute to nonlinearities in the zero-crossing region.

• Second is Bryston's continuing efforts to reduce low-level noise. The clarity of Bryston's designs is enhanced at low listening levels by pushing the noise floor far below the signal level, improving the 'silence between the notes' and enhancing the clarity of the music at low power levels.

• Third is Bryston's concentration on reducing distortion at all levels, and most especially at high frequencies. Bryston amplifiers are perhaps the only designs to concentrate as much effort at reducing HF distortion artifacts as we do, and the results are remarkably 'flat' THD-with-frequency curves, showing almost no tendency to increase distortion as frequency rises. This has the effect of reducing overall 'haze', helping to pull the quietest passages out of the background.

• In addition to the above, the new Cubed Series employs highly effective RF rejection in the power supplies, which traps and eliminates radio-frequency hash from either interfering with or emanating from the amplifier via the power cable or signal cables.

There are other small contributors to this low-level clarity, some having to do with power-supply design for extreme stability, (and in Stereo or multi-channel amps, separated for each channel), which very notably improves the placement-in-space and focus of the sonic 'image'. We think the overall result is an unprecedented degree of clarity and freedom from artificiality, especially noticeable at lower levels in comparison with other designs, but continuing to even the highest outputs.

Further Info:

A few years ago, we had a review in a Swedish magazine that pronounced the 14B SST2 to be 'perfect'. That was not based on 'he liked it'; it had nothing to do with auditory preference, it had to do with transparency. The reviewer had and still has a setup where he can literally 'bypass' an amplifier to drop it out of the signal path, (dummy speaker load, gain-reduction L-pad, leading to a second amplifier to the speakers). The 14B SST2 turned out to be impossible to detect in the signal path, on any signal they tried, from simple guitar music to full orchestra ffff, to an electronic metronome with instant rise time and no overshoot. And it was the first audio device in his history to do so.

That does not mean the amplifier is actually 'perfect', of course. It just means that it is not contributing, (or subtracting), anything the ear can detect, to or from the signal path in an otherwise exemplary system.

From that result and many others of our own, we concluded that static distortion measurements do not tell the whole story. It would seem that if static THD and IMD are low enough, 0.001% or -100dB, they cease to be relevant factors in the transparency of the device. ‎More important are time smear, deviations in frequency-response, dynamic distortions, noise within the device or from RF interference, etc.

Thus we did not introduce our new 'Salomie' input stage (which we received a patent on) simply to reduce static distortion. Our newest 'Cubed Series' amplifiers do have lower THD and IMD than the 'Squared Series' that preceded them, but not significantly so. They measure out at about 0.001% or a bit below, over almost the entire frequency band. However, and we consider this to be most important, they are quieter and more musically accurate in a number of ways; First, the 20-20K noise is reduced, but the new input stage has far better PSRR, or power-supply rejection ratio. This means hash on the power-supply is rejected, in this case by more than 140dB. The input stage also has much better CMRR, or common-mode rejection. That means it rejects noise coming in on the signal cable much more completely than before. These are dynamic issues that can show up in a real-world system completely apart from static THD and IMD.

The audible improvements we realized with these approaches are rather subtle. They would have to be with amps that started out 'perfect' in at least one reviewer's description, but they show up from very low listening levels, almost whisper-quiet, where the silences are more inky-black than before. It's almost an unconscious realization. They amps also cope better with dirt and hash of all kinds on the power cord, from distorted 60Hz Voltage to RF. Thus the quiet middle-of-the-night listening is even more relaxing and emotionally accessible. The depth of the soundstage and the precision of instrument placement is closer to reality than ever before. ‎

Of course, that's what it really boils down to; recreating the original musical experience in your home. The 'you are there' feeling. It's what we have been pursuing from day one, and are still focused on. The Cubed Series is closer than ever.

james

jdandy 09-19-2019 12:35 PM

James.......That is an informative response to the original question. Quite enlightening. Thank you for posting your analysis of the benefits Bryston's Cube Series amplifiers provide.

clpetersen 09-19-2019 05:50 PM

Hello James - thanks for the design philosophy - as a very pleased cubed series owner, I very much appreciate the engineering, performance, and reliability that Bryston delivers. Grazie.

dkorbal 09-20-2019 07:37 AM

James - Thanks for the informative reply. As a researching audiophile Bryston is on my very short list of amps to pair with my 803D3. My wife and I tend to listen to music in the evening hours and at lower volumes. I’m particularly interested in amps that perform best at these levels. Your words help nudge me more towards a 7B3 or 4B3.

GSOphile 09-20-2019 08:57 AM

James, excellent post!

Art Vandelay 10-05-2019 04:27 AM

Thanks James for those insights.

The proof of the pudding......
Is in the measurements, and the experience in the listening chair. And I've always liked what I heard when I've heard a cubed. Perfect top to bottom but I think the excellence is at the top, because the treble is the hardest bit to get exactly right and the cubed series doesn't seem to add or subtract anything. Very pristine, grain-free and very natural attack and decay of percussion and cymbals.

I'm guessing that the topology employs some voltage or current (negative) feedback with distortion so low, but there's usually a trade-off for unconditional stability at the expense of distortion above 10kHz. The cubed series manages to defy the norms somehow. Maybe a few tricks in the way the transimpedance stage is compensated, but distortion so low requires meticulous attention to layout as well as design, RF immunity, and maintaining optimum bias in the output stage to avoid crossover related distortions etc. The Bryston design team obviously has all aspects covered.

Musicmansweden 10-17-2019 12:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dkorbal (Post 980195)
James - Thanks for the informative reply. As a researching audiophile Bryston is on my very short list of amps to pair with my 803D3. My wife and I tend to listen to music in the evening hours and at lower volumes. I’m particularly interested in amps that perform best at these levels. Your words help nudge me more towards a 7B3 or 4B3.



Good luck with your choice of amps; I am a happy owner of B&W 803D3 and Bryston 4B3 - give it a try, there is a good chance you would like it.

Br,

Johannes

dkorbal 10-17-2019 03:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Musicmansweden (Post 982888)
Good luck with your choice of amps; I am a happy owner of B&W 803D3 and Bryston 4B3 - give it a try, there is a good chance you would like it.

Br,

Johannes

Thanks for the input Johannes. Still mulling it over.

James Tanner - Bryston 10-28-2019 08:08 AM

Hi James

New excellent Review on 3B CUBED in Germany under link:

https://www.fairaudio.de/test/brysto...staerker-test/

urbanluthier 10-29-2019 12:55 PM

.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:55 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.10
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©Copyright 2009-2023 AudioAficionado.org.Privately owned, All Rights Reserved.