Been absentee lately building an amp. PSE 45 with voltage regulator tubes instead of Zener diodes. Heading over to the shop to listen and bench test it. Dennis is chomping at the bit to listen to it. If he really likes it, maybe he will offer his own version....
http://i443.photobucket.com/albums/q...pskpejkgrx.jpg http://i443.photobucket.com/albums/q...ps33zme2xm.jpg What can I say, I love that tube glow! http://i443.photobucket.com/albums/q...psrr8iptwj.jpg |
I don't think you have enough tubes for a 3wpc amp.
|
Quote:
:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D I think the VR tubes will make it sound more powerful that 3 watts. |
http://i443.photobucket.com/albums/q...psqxa3dl4m.png
Sounds like Diana Krall is sitting right in front of us... |
Wow! Good work! That is one impressive amp, do you have any upskirt shots?
Can this power supply be applied to PSE amps using higher output tubes? Love to hear how it compared to its stable mates. What speakers were you auditioning it with?:tresbon: |
Quote:
http://i443.photobucket.com/albums/q...psjwgamzjp.jpg My work has a long way to go to match the neatness of Dennis' layouts, but since I've built less than 10 of my own scratch builds, and Dennis has prolly built 1000's, I'm making progress. It always helps to learn at the feet of the master. The power supply is a standard type, just over engineered. Using TDSL to model it, I think the ripple voltage is supposed to be on the order of 500 nV. It has 5 filter stages, including two chokes. Here's the PS schematic.... http://i443.photobucket.com/albums/q...pssdxoat0q.jpg Pardon the oil stain. I absentmindedly tossed a gun cleaning rag on top of it. One of the hazards of having a multi purpose man cave. As far as the sound, Dennis says it's still an old man's amp, only with a splash of Geritol thrown in. The best way I can describe it is that both amps let the true nature of the different types of output tubes shine through. However, compared to a single 45 per channel SET amp, it has more presence and authority, with a mid range that drips honey and syrup. Perhaps not everyone's cup of tea, but it suits me, dare I say it, to a T. Think of a regular 45 amp on steroids. We listened to it on the standard shop speakers. I have a few more minor changes to make and it's going into my main system.... |
I wish this forum supported likes or thumbs up. Anyway, looks amazing @Analog Addict, I hope one day to design my own amps.
Quite beautiful with that tube glow! I have a few updates on tube opinions with my fire-bottle. #1 New stock Tung-Sol 6550 crush Tung-Sol 6550 NOS (at least the NOS I bought). #2 we6sn7 initial impression is cross between psvane cv181 mkii and shuguang cv181-t sounds. I'll have to listen more, but it's not a revelation, anybody with either cv181 isn't missing out. |
Quote:
Curiously, I find the Psvane CV-181 T-II too revealing, almost strident on top except with the KT-66 Z (with which it is great), while the CV-181 T from Shu Guang seems more laid back. I'm hoping to find the CV-181 Z a middle-of-the road between these two. Then again, the input tube creates synergies with the right output tube, so there are no absolute input tube winners IMO. BTW, I'm still trying to match the misterious GL KT-77 with the ideal input tube. I have several iterations to try yet (NOS and new production). |
Quote:
|
Quote:
http://i443.photobucket.com/albums/q...psqnsnyyk2.jpg |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:31 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.10
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©Copyright 2009-2023 AudioAficionado.org.Privately owned, All Rights Reserved.