turntable |
02-04-2013 01:20 AM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by cmalak
(Post 438032)
Shane....it should. The GAT is almost 1.5X the price of Ref 5SE I believe. Fairer fight would have been the Ref 40 Anniv vs. GAT (similar price points). Just saying :D :thumbsup:
|
Hi Cyril
My main point was we all get stuck on this is a balanced design, therefore only balanced need apply and visa versa. That was my thought as well.
Pairing a single ended GAT with a fully balanced amp might seem out of whack. Some may read my choice and just think, well Shane is a cj fanboi and does know any better:scratch2:
That is why I prefaced I compared it with the Ref5se to give some level of context.
Yes, the more expensive pre amp out performed the less expensive pre - that is not always the case.. To be honest, I was expecting it to be very close considering that the ARC is fully balanced, whereas in overall musical performance, it was not.
So for me, no need to change my pre amp.:D
When we are all looking at that next upgrade, we should be a little more open minded and look at the ultimate musical performance, not the topology of the amplifier.
Another classic example is Jerome using Shindo amps with Wilson Sasha - I bet many people said / thought Jerome was crazy and it will not work. It could not possibly be better than his 300 watt Mac tube amps. the Shindo amps sound wonderful with the Sasha's and comfortably outperformed the Mac amps, that he sold them.
Bravo Jerome for looking outside the box.:yes:
|