ehoove
06-12-2011, 03:15 PM
I recently acquired a very nice TD126 MkIII with a Signet AK50 tonearm, and thought I would offer some initial thoughts and impressions.
I have cleaned and re-oiled the bearing and given the table a general cleaning. I will clean and polish the bearing once I receive the new thrust plate for the 7mm bearing from my friend Joel. I have not altered the table in any way at this point.
This is a very well built table, and the ergonomics are as close to perfect as I have encountered.
It is a bit industrial looking compared to the TD125, TD125 MkII I have owned, and the look is growing on me as compared to the Silver/Wood appearance of the former models.
The Signet AK50 Arm is a beautiful piece of workmanship and is the brother to the Audio Technica AT1100S arm. At 6.5gr effective mass it is a honest low mass arm. I am running a Audio Technica At13ea cartridge with a new Audio Technica ATN14 Shibata Stylus, and the match is very good. The resonance of the arm comes in at 9Hz using the Shure Era 4 Test record tracking the cartridge at 1.4 gr. I am using a CA640P/Hypnotoaded Preamp BTW
The comparison to the TD125 MkII is using a Denon DL160 HOMC with the stock TP16 MkI arm 16.5 Gr effective mass, so it is subjective at best. I have always felt the TD125 series was lean in the bass compared to the TD160 series, and this continued when running this cartridge/stylus combo in the TD160 Super with the TP16 MkIII low mass arm. Td TD 160 series just seems to have more grunt in the bottom end to me, but the AK50 arm in the TD126 MkIII has grunt and more! The cartridge/Stylus combo has more control and clarity, as well as more attack, and definition than in the TD160 Super with the TP16 MkIII arm. That being said I must state that that combo I found very, very good.
I have found that the reoccurring thought that comes to mind in evaluating new and vintage equipment is control of the medium at all volumes, and this table/ arm combo does it better than any TD series table I have owned ( TD125, TD125 MkII, TD 150, TD 160, TD160 Super) other than my Hot Rodded TD160/Project 9cc/Sumiko Blackbird rig, which is comparing apples to oranges.
I did have a chance to listen at length to a TD160 Super with the Magnpan Unitrac 1 arm/Audio Technica AT15SA cartridge and still think the TD126 MKIII has more bottom end grunt and definition. This table is the real deal, and all I have done is oil the bearing, and add silicone to the damping trough of the tone arm, and of course do the proper alignment and VTA adjustment of the cartridge of course. once again this is subjective due to the difference in arms and cartridge.
Over all this is a wonderfully musical Table and tonearm combination for use with a High compliance cartridge. It exhibits the control and execution of a much more costly table, and is built like it as well. There is a NOS Sonus Gold Blue cartridge on the way, and I must say as a die hard Moving Coil guy, this table and the TD160 Super it replaced have opened my eyes to the virtues on MM/Moving Iron design cartridges. Did someone say Soundsmith Voice?:scratch2:
Regards,
Jim
I have cleaned and re-oiled the bearing and given the table a general cleaning. I will clean and polish the bearing once I receive the new thrust plate for the 7mm bearing from my friend Joel. I have not altered the table in any way at this point.
This is a very well built table, and the ergonomics are as close to perfect as I have encountered.
It is a bit industrial looking compared to the TD125, TD125 MkII I have owned, and the look is growing on me as compared to the Silver/Wood appearance of the former models.
The Signet AK50 Arm is a beautiful piece of workmanship and is the brother to the Audio Technica AT1100S arm. At 6.5gr effective mass it is a honest low mass arm. I am running a Audio Technica At13ea cartridge with a new Audio Technica ATN14 Shibata Stylus, and the match is very good. The resonance of the arm comes in at 9Hz using the Shure Era 4 Test record tracking the cartridge at 1.4 gr. I am using a CA640P/Hypnotoaded Preamp BTW
The comparison to the TD125 MkII is using a Denon DL160 HOMC with the stock TP16 MkI arm 16.5 Gr effective mass, so it is subjective at best. I have always felt the TD125 series was lean in the bass compared to the TD160 series, and this continued when running this cartridge/stylus combo in the TD160 Super with the TP16 MkIII low mass arm. Td TD 160 series just seems to have more grunt in the bottom end to me, but the AK50 arm in the TD126 MkIII has grunt and more! The cartridge/Stylus combo has more control and clarity, as well as more attack, and definition than in the TD160 Super with the TP16 MkIII arm. That being said I must state that that combo I found very, very good.
I have found that the reoccurring thought that comes to mind in evaluating new and vintage equipment is control of the medium at all volumes, and this table/ arm combo does it better than any TD series table I have owned ( TD125, TD125 MkII, TD 150, TD 160, TD160 Super) other than my Hot Rodded TD160/Project 9cc/Sumiko Blackbird rig, which is comparing apples to oranges.
I did have a chance to listen at length to a TD160 Super with the Magnpan Unitrac 1 arm/Audio Technica AT15SA cartridge and still think the TD126 MKIII has more bottom end grunt and definition. This table is the real deal, and all I have done is oil the bearing, and add silicone to the damping trough of the tone arm, and of course do the proper alignment and VTA adjustment of the cartridge of course. once again this is subjective due to the difference in arms and cartridge.
Over all this is a wonderfully musical Table and tonearm combination for use with a High compliance cartridge. It exhibits the control and execution of a much more costly table, and is built like it as well. There is a NOS Sonus Gold Blue cartridge on the way, and I must say as a die hard Moving Coil guy, this table and the TD160 Super it replaced have opened my eyes to the virtues on MM/Moving Iron design cartridges. Did someone say Soundsmith Voice?:scratch2:
Regards,
Jim